Posts Tagged ‘Pensions’

The California Pension Crisis

Sunday, July 31st, 2016

Last week, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CALPERS) released its rate of return for the past year. CALPERS budgets based on a 7.5% return per year. In a “Missed it by that much” moment, they came in at 0.61%. Oops.

But for California taxpayers it’s a real issue: California taxpayers will have to make up the shortfall. California State Senator John Moorlach (R-Costa Mesa) has the right idea: “Now we’re in Peter Pan territory. ‘You’ve just got to believe’… the stock market will rise more than 7.5 percent per year. You’ve just got to believe that interest rates will stay at zero indefinitely. You’ve just got to believe that real estate prices will continue to rise.”

Here’s the reality: Taxes must massively increase or state payrolls must massively decrease. Let’s add more taxes to the most heavily taxed state in the country; I’m sure that will go over well…especially just to pay pensions. Might even more of the middle class do what I did? (Hint: The answer is yes.)

Actually, the idea of cutting California government by 30% is wonderful. It also has a 0% chance of happening in California. A repeal of Proposition 13 would require approval by California voters; there’s a chance (albeit small) that could pass; if it did, it would guarantee more middle class departures from the state. On this year’s California ballot is an initiative to extend the “temporary” California tax hikes.

I hope no one wonders why I call California the Bronze State.

“Threatens to Bankrupt [California]”

Wednesday, October 6th, 2010

That line was used by the Orange County Register to describe the California Center for Public Policy’s report on Pensions and Employee Compensation. That’s scary.

Here’s a quote from the Register:

The report says that the state’s tax-paid pensions have made defacto millionaires out of most of California’s employees by the time they reach their late 50s. Meanwhile, public safety and other employees frequently pay less than half or none of their retirement benefits, says the report, “Reforming Public Employee Pensions and Compensation.”

Here’s the conclusion from the Report.

California faces three choices in the coming years to right its government fiscal imbalance at state, school district, county, and city levels–though usually only the first two are considered:
1) reduce services;
2) raise taxes, fees, and charges; or
3) pay public employees fair salaries, benefits, and pensions
The third choice is the preferred alternative to avoid either further and continually diminishing government services, or further and continually increasing taxes, or both. California’s budgetary crises would be resolved with more more public services and lower taxes if public employees were paid fair salaries, benefits, and pensions.

The full report is well worth your time as it succinctly describes the reality not just in California but in most states and locales in the country.

Only in Government Can the Lender and Borrower be the Same

Sunday, June 13th, 2010

When I read this, I did a double take. From the New York Times:

Gov. David A. Paterson and legislative leaders have tentatively agreed to allow the state and municipalities to borrow nearly $6 billion to help them make their required annual payments to the state pension fund.

And, in classic budgetary sleight-of-hand, they will borrow the money to make the payments to the pension fund — from the same pension fund.

Of course this makes no sense. And of course it will come back to hurt New York State. For politicians, though, a problem postponed is someone else’s to deal with…and, thus, nothing to be concerned with.

That’s just like Lt. Drebin at the end of the clip (below): There’s nothing to see here (unless you’re a concerned taxpayer).

What’s $2 Trillion Among Friends

Saturday, January 9th, 2010

From the Financial Times comes word that there are $2 Trillion worth of unfunded pensions at just the state and local level in the United States. The Financial Times article relies on a study by Orin Kramer of New Jersey’s pension fund.

The estimate by Orin Kramer will fuel investors’ concerns over the deteriorating financial health of US states after the recession. “State and local governments are correctly perceived to be in serious difficulty,” Mr Kramer told the Financial Times.

“If you factor in the reality of these unfunded promises, their deficits will rise exponentially.”

Estimates of aggregate funding requirement of the US pension system have ranged between $400bn and $500bn, but Mr Kramer’s analysis concluded that public funds would need to find more than $2,000bn to meet future pension obligations.

This has huge implications for American taxation, and for residents in states and localities impacted by this (including California):

  1. Would the elected officials attempt to fix the unfunded pensions by decreasing benefits, decreasing eligibility, increasing taxes, or just ignore the problem?
  2. Would local officials declare Chapter 9 Bankruptcy? (Bankruptcy is not allowed for states.)
  3. Would individuals in impact locales move to avoid higher taxes?
  4. What impact will this have on public employee unions?

If you see a mess on the horizon, you’re dead-on accurate. Add in lots of problems on the state level, a very low return on lots of investments (which hurts pension funding), and extreme resistance to higher taxation and you end up with a Grade A disaster.

Some of the time the light at the end of the tunnel is the end of your problems. Here, I think it’s the oncoming train.