Posts Tagged ‘HealthCareLegislation’

It’s a Tax: What ObamaCare Means for You

Sunday, July 1st, 2012

Unless you were shipwrecked on a deserted island you know that the Supreme Court ruled that the Affordable Care Act, aka ObamaCare, is a legal “tax.” Back in February 2010 I wrote about the taxes in ObamaCare. Let’s run down the entire list (now that we know what’s in the bill) and see how this impacts you. The italicized text is from February 2010 (the proposal). Numbers refer to [individuals]/[families].

1. Individual Mandate Tax. For those who don’t purchase health insurance, this income tax surcharge continues to exist in this plan. I couldn’t determine the exact rate. This begins on January 1, 2014. The penalty is $95 (at first) but increases to the greater of $695 or 2.5% of modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) in 2016. (Families pay three times the individual number for the minimum tax.) The tax is indexed to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for future years.

Something to realize is that most of the taxes in the measure are based on MAGI. This means your income before itemized deductions. For individuals who are, say, amateur gamblers who have $100,000 of wins and $100,000 or losses, you will pay taxes based on your winnings but not your losses. This is not a good thing (unless you like paying lots of taxes).

2. Employer Mandate Tax. On businesses with 50+ employees that do not offer health care, and at least one employee qualifies for a tax credit, $750/employee. This will cause many small businesses to stop growing once they reach 49 employees. Those figures come from the prior version.

In the final version of the law, the Employer Mandate Tax is $2,000/employee with it going into effect on January 1, 2014. There is also a $3,000/employee penalty if the government finds they provide workers with “unaffordable” health insurance. There ‘s an obvious solution to small employers: Don’t hire employee #50. And for those who have 51 or 52 employees, let those “excess” employees go. And that’s exactly what is guaranteed to happen.

This tax is guaranteed to hurt the economy in numerous ways. It will cause employers to cut employees. It will cost employees health insurance; if the $3,000/employee penalty applies to health insurance that’s unaffordable and you have just 30 employees, the solution is simple–don’t offer health insurance. The title of my previous post was, “It’s unpopular, unworkable, and insane, so naturally they’re in a hurry to pass it.” It remains an insane plan.

3. Excise Tax on Health Insurance Plans. Beginning in 2018, 40% tax (the percentage may be wrong) on plans costing $10,200/$27,500. Is indexed to CPI. This is in the law at the percentages and dollar amounts noted; it goes into effect in 2018.

4. Health Insurance would be reported on W-2s. Another mandate that increases costs for business. It’s unclear whether this mandate survived. However, the White House release states that loopholes will be closed which implies this remains. It survived and is in the law.

5. “Medicine Cabinet Tax.” Limitation on HSAs, FSAs, and MSAs to purchase non-prescription medication except insulin. This is in the law and is already in effect (as of 2011).

6. HSA Withdrawal Tax Increased. The tax would increase to 20% from 10%. It’s in the law and went into effect in 2011.

7. FSAs capped at a maximum of $2500. They are now uncapped. This goes into effect in 2013 (it is indexed to CPI after 2013). This will especially hurt parents of special needs children who have utilized FSA dollars for special needs education. That kind of education can easily run over $10,000 per year.

8. 1099 Reporting for corporations. Requires businesses to send 1099-MISCs to corporations. This is another cost for businesses. This will begin in 2011 and will definitely increase my income. This is definitely in the proposal, but it’s unclear if this starts in 2011. While this was in the law, Congress repealed this section of the law after outcries from almost every business in the country.

8. Tax on Charitable Hospitals. This excise tax of $50,000 per hospital impacts hospitals that don’t meet new Department of Health and Human Services regulations. It’s unclear whether this is in the proposal. This went into law in 2010 and impacts hopspitals that do not meet “community health assessment needs,” “financial assistance,” and “billing and collection rules” set by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

9. Tax on Drug Companies. There’s definitely a tax on drug companies, but the size and timing of the tax is unclear. This went into effect in 2010 as a $2.3 billion annual tax based on the share of sales made in a year.

10. Tax on Medical Device Manufacturers. This tax is in the bill, but the size and timing of the tax is not clear. This goes into effect in 2013, and is a 2.3% excise tax. How many medical device manufacturers will now establish overseas subsidiaries not subject to US taxation? I’d expect many to do so. Given that there are 360,000 people employed in the US in this industry, there will be layoffs in this industry caused by this tax.

11. Tax on Health Insurers. This tax is definitely in the bill, but the size and timing of the tax is unclear. This tax goes into effect in 2014, and phases in gradually until 2018. The tax immediately hits firms with $50 million in profits (or more) and is based on premiums collected.

12. Elimination of tax deduction for employer provided retirement prescription drug coverage. It is unclear whether this tax is in the measure. It’s in the law and goes into effect in 2013.

13. Increase of percentage of AGI required to deduct medical expenses from 7.5% to 10%. Few can deduct medical expenses today; fewer will be able to deduct them tomorrow. This goes into effect in 2013. However, for those 65 or older the AGI percentage will remain at 7.5% through 2016 (seniors will join everyone else at 10% in 2017).

14. Compensation Limitation for Health Insurance Executives. If you work in that industry, you will be limited to a salary of $500,000. There’s no mention of this in the measure. However, given the Obama Administration’s stance on various pay-related measures, it’s likely included. It goes into effect in 2013.

15. Medicare Payroll Tax Hikes. Once your income exceeds $200,000/$250,000 (MFJ), you will pay an additional 0.9% tax. Note that the employer will only collect (and be responsible for this tax) if you earn $200,000/$250,000 or more. This also impacts the self-employed. And the law is written so that the self-employed cannot deduct half of the new tax as a deduction to income tax. It appears this provision is dead. However, it’s been replaced with something worse (see below). Unfortunately, this tax is in the final version of the law and takes effect in 2013.

16. New Hospital Insurance Tax. “The Act will include an additional 0.9 percentage point Hospital Insurance tax for households with incomes exceeding $200,000 for singles and $250,000 for married couples filing jointly.” I remember then-candidate Obama stating that if you made under $250,000, he wouldn’t increase your taxes. Yeah, right. This tax is not in the final version of the law.

16. New Unearned Income Tax. “[The Act] would add a 2.9 percent tax for households with incomes exceeding $200,000 for singles and $250,000 for married couples filing jointly to unearned income including interest, dividends, annuities, royalties and rents (excluding income from active participation in S corporations).” This is yet another measure which will stifle the economy in the United States. For my amateur gambling clients, this is particularly bad—it means your taxes will go up based on your gambling winnings, not your gambling net income. This goes into effect in 2013. While it’s called a “Surtax on Investment Income,” it will include dividends, capital gains, interest (the things you think about), passive income (partnerships, S-Corps, and trusts), royalties, rents, and Other Income (including gambling income). It does not include active business income, distributions from retirement plans, and sales of ownership interests in pass-through entities. It also does not apply to non-resident aliens.

17. Blue Cross Tax. There is a tax deduction available today for Blue Cross and Blue Shield companies; this tax deduction will vanish if they don’t spend 85% (or more) of premiums on clinical services. There’s no mention of this in the proposal. However, it was in both the House and Senate Democratic proposals and I expect it’s in this one, too. This went into effect in 2010.

18. Tax on Indoor Tanning. A new 10% excise tax on indoor tanning salons. This one made the cut. This went into effect in 2010.

19. Paper Production and Cellulosic Biofuels. “[Close] the loophole that allows certain byproducts of paper production to be eligible for the cellulosic biofuels producer credit.” This new tax provision is in the measure. This went into effect in 2010.

20. Strengthen Economic Substance Rules. “[Help] prevent tax shelters by clarifying the definition of when activities have true “economic substance” beyond evading taxes.” While the details aren’t listed, it’s clear that this provision will strengthen the economic substance rules. This will increase costs for complex transactions, and will likely depress economic activity. This went into effect in 2010.


President Obama and his surrogates have stated that the ACA (ObamaCare) is not a tax. White House Press Secretary Jay Carney stated the following:

“It’s a penalty, because you have a choice. You don’t have a choice to pay your taxes, right?” Carney said.

Carney was initially reluctant to assign a label to the fine when pressed repeatedly by reporters Friday. “Call it what you want,” he said…“You can call it what you want,” he said. “If you read the opinion, it is not a broad-based tax. It affects one percent, by CBO estimates, of the population. It is not something that you assess like an income tax.” It was unclear which Congressional Budget Office estimate Carney was referring to. Despite being pressed on the issue, though, the spokesman would not relent.

Bluntly, this is B.S. There are twenty tax increases in ObamaCare. You can parse words any way you like, but many of these measures are labeled as “taxes” and “surtaxes”. If you can read what I wrote above about the twenty tax increases in ObamaCare and still state that it’s not a tax, well, I suggest you apply for a job at the White House. The Supreme Court said it’s a tax. It contains twenty tax increases. President Obama’s argument that it’s not a tax is clearly wrong.

For the rest of us, this gives a clear choice in the election this November. Mitt Romney has pledged that his first job if he takes office will be the repeal of ObamaCare. President Obama and his administration have pledged the full implementation of ObamaCare (and the rescinding of the Bush Tax Cuts). You can’t get a much clearer choice than that.

ObamaCare Unconstitutional; Impact on Taxes?

Tuesday, February 1st, 2011

As most of you know, a second federal court judge has ruled the Health Care Law that passed last year is unconstitutional. Judge Rodger Vinson didn’t just rule that the mandate that health insurance must be bought is stricken; rather, he struck down the entire law. While the Obama Administration is publicly stating the law will continue to be enforced (and, in theory, either Judge Vinson or the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals could issue a stay to Judge Vinson’s ruling), as of now the law is void.

What next for the tanning tax? Or the numerous other tax provisions in the legislation that impact individuals? How about the business tax provisions?

I’m not an attorney, but the Volokh Conspiracy has some good posts up on this, though they aren’t really looking at the tax consequences (but do look at the constitutional issues in depth). As I was writing this, I noticed that Joe Kristan was asking the same questions.

My best guess is that the 11th Circuit will stay the decision until they review it. And it sure looks like this case is bound for the Supreme Court (perhaps in 2012 or 2013).

So if you’re a tanning salon should you stop collecting the 10% excise tax on tanning? I’ll probably have an answer in a couple of weeks but that answer could easily change between now and 2013.

Unearned Income Tax in New Healthcare Bill Will Impact Gambling

Thursday, March 18th, 2010

The new healthcare legislation contains plenty of taxes. One especially bad one is a new 3.8% tax on unearned income above $200,000. This will have a very bad impact on amateur gamblers.

When I last looked at the bill, the tax was 2.9%. In the “final” version of the bill, it’s up to 3.8%. Let’s take a hypothetical gambler, Joe Student. Mr. Student has $500,000 of winning sessions and $495,000 of losing sessions. After his standard deduction and exemption he owes no tax.

But not in the near future. He’ll owe 3.8% on $300,000 of mostly phantom income, or $11,400. What will Joe Student do? He’ll cheat on his taxes, of course. Pay $6,400 more than what he made on his income—you must be kidding! But that’s exactly what the legislation dictates.

This legislation is bad in many ways, but from a tax standpoint it’s a disaster. Unfortunately, I don’t have the time right now to read the bill and find out what other nuggets are in the legislation; I’m forced to rely on others such as Keith Hennessey. Luckily, Mr. Hennessey and others do have the time to review legislation that remains unpopular, unworkable, and insane.

It’s Unpopular, Unworkable, and Insane, So Naturally They’re in a Hurry to Pass It (Part 2)

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

When I last wrote about the healthcare legislation, I noted the 17 taxes which would be in the plan. Let’s see what’s new in the “Unified Health Care Legislation” proposed by President Obama.

1. Individual Mandate Tax. For those who don’t purchase health insurance, this income tax surcharge continues to exist in this plan. I couldn’t determine the exact rate.

2. Employer Mandate Tax. On businesses with 50+ employees that do not offer health care, and at least one employee qualifies for a tax credit, $750/employee. This will cause many small businesses to stop growing once they reach 49 employees. Those figures come from the prior version. News reports indicate that this tax is still in the proposal.

It is unclear if a waiting period tax remains in the legislation.

3. Excise Tax on Health Insurance Plans. Beginning in 2013 2018, 40% tax (the percentage may be wrong) on plans costing $8500/$23,000 $10,200/$27,500. Is indexed to CPI. It is unclear whether exemptions in the Senate version have been continued in this proposal.

4. Health Insurance would be reported on W-2s. Another mandate that increases costs for business. It’s unclear whether this mandate survived. However, the White House release states that loopholes will be closed which implies this remains.

5. “Medicine Cabinet Tax.” Limitation on HSAs, FSAs, and MSAs to purchase non-prescription medication except insulin. Note that this is also in the House healthcare bill. This is definitely in the new proposal.

6. HSA Withdrawal Tax Increased. The tax would increase to 20% from 10%. This is also in the House legislation. This is definitely in the proposal.

7. FSAs capped at a maximum of $2500. They are now uncapped. This is definitely in the proposal.

8. 1099 Reporting for corporations. Requires businesses to send 1099-MISCs to corporations. This is another cost for businesses. This will begin in 2011 and will definitely increase my income. This is definitely in the proposal, but it’s unclear if this starts in 2011.

9. Tax on Charitable Hospitals. This excise tax of $50,000 per hospital impacts hospitals that don’t meet new Department of Health and Human Services regulations. It’s unclear whether this is in the proposal.

10. Tax on Drug Companies. The tax would be $2.3 billion based on sales percentage. There’s definitely a tax on drug companies, but the size and timing of the tax is unclear.

11. Tax on Medical Device Manufacturers. The $2 billion tax is also based on sales percentage. It rises to $3 billion in 2017. This tax is in the bill, but the size and timing of the tax is not clear.

12. Tax on Health Insurers. A $6.7 $10 billion tax based on percentage of health insurance premiums collected. It now phases in gradually until 2017. This tax is definitely in the bill, but the size and timing of the tax is unclear.

13. Elimination of tax deduction for employer provided retirement prescription drug coverage. It is unclear whether this tax is in the measure.

14. Increase of percentage of AGI required to deduct medical expenses from 7.5% to 10%. Few can deduct medical expenses today; fewer will be able to deduct them tomorrow. It is unclear whether this tax is in the proposal.

15. Compensation Limitation for Health Insurance Executives. If you work in that industry, you will be limited to a salary of $500,000. There’s no mention of this in the measure. However, given the Obama Administration’s stance on various pay-related measures, it’s likely included.

16. Medicare Payroll Tax Hikes. Once your income exceeds $200,000/$250,000 (MFJ), you will pay an additional 0.9% tax. Note that the employer will only collect (and be responsible for this tax) if you earn $200,000/$250,000 or more. This also impacts the self-employed. And the law is written so that the self-employed cannot deduct half of the new tax as a deduction to income tax. It appears this provision is dead. However, it’s been replaced with something worse (see below).

16. New Hospital Insurance Tax. “The Act will include an additional 0.9 percentage point Hospital Insurance tax for households with incomes exceeding $200,000 for singles and $250,000 for married couples filing jointly.” I remember then-candidate Obama stating that if you made under $250,000, he wouldn’t increase your taxes. Yeah, right.

17. New Unearned Income Tax. “[The Act] would add a 2.9 percent tax for households with incomes exceeding $200,000 for singles and $250,000 for married couples filing jointly to unearned income including interest, dividends, annuities, royalties and rents (excluding income from active participation in S corporations).” This is yet another measure which will stifle the economy in the United States. For my amateur gambling clients, this is particularly bad—it means your taxes will go up based on your gambling winnings, not your gambling net income.

18. Blue Cross Tax. There is a tax deduction available today for Blue Cross and Blue Shield companies; this tax deduction will vanish if they don’t spend 85% (or more) of premiums on clinical services. There’s no mention of this in the proposal. However, it was in both the House and Senate Democratic proposals and I expect it’s in this one, too.

19. Excise Tax on Cosmetic Medical Procedures. A new 5% excise tax on these procedures. This one is dead.

19. Tax on Indoor Tanning. A new 10% excise tax on indoor tanning salons. This one made the cut.

20. Paper Production and Cellulosic Biofuels. “[Close] the loophole that allows certain byproducts of paper production to be eligible for the cellulosic biofuels producer credit.” This new tax provision is in the measure.

21. Strengthen Economic Substance Rules. “[Help] prevent tax shelters by clarifying the definition of when activities have true “economic substance” beyond evading taxes.” While the details aren’t listed, it’s clear that this provision will strengthen the economic substance rules. This will increase costs for complex transactions, and will likely depress economic activity.


Obviously, the devil is in the details and all that’s been released is a framework. Unfortunately, the framework looks rotten to the core. The Congressional Budget Office can’t determine what the cost of the measure is. And until the actual legislation appears, line by line, who knows what’s in it. The House bill was a model of brevity at just under 2,000 pages. The Senate bill was just a wee bit longer, at around 2,800 pages. I suppose this measure (when we see it) will be about 3,500 pages. What appears certain is that there are more taxes in this measure.

The public doesn’t want this. They believe (rightly) it will add yet more bureaucracy to Washington, and that it reeks of socialized medicine. So who cares about the cost (estimated at just under $1 Trillion by the White House), public opinion, or that it will devastate the economy.

Are the Democrats in Sacramento that Blind?

Thursday, January 21st, 2010

There was an election in Massachusetts on Tuesday. As I’m sure you’re aware, Republican Scott Brown is the new Republican Senator from Massachusetts. Apparently, Democrats in Sacramento are blind to the obvious.

The voters in Massachusetts, a state more liberal than California, had enough of tax and spend, and the Democrats’ health care plan. They wanted fiscal responsibility. So what happened in Sacramento today?

SB810, a $220 billion healthcare plan, passed on a party-line vote today in Sacramento. The bill would create a one-payer system, is far more intrusive than any of the proposals in Washington, and is one that would officially bankrupt California. The good news is that it is extraordinarily unlikely that Governor Schwarzenegger would sign the measure.

Still, why this measure even saw the light of day says a lot about the dysfunction in Sacramento and why I expect more smoke and mirrors to be the “solution” to the budget crisis in the state capital.

They’re Mad as Hell and They’re Not Going to Take It Any More!

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

Many of you may remember the movie classic Network:

On Tuesday, voters in Massachusetts sent a message to politicians. Massachusetts elected a Republican Senator. To put that in perspective, the last time a Republican was elected to the Senate in Massachusetts was in 1976, nearly forty years ago.

Massachusetts elects Democrats the same as the Sun rises in the eastern sky every day. But that didn’t happen on Tuesday. The why of that has to both directly and indirectly with taxes.

Massachusetts has been known informally for years as “Taxachusetts.” Actually, the Commonwealth is no longer among the “leaders” in high taxes in the U.S. It’s not that Massachusetts has gotten better; rather, other states, California included, have gotten worse. Still, Massachusetts recently had an initiative to eliminate its income tax (it failed). The current governor, Democrat Deval Patrick, has proposed tax increases. The voters in Massachusetts haven’t shown much love for that idea.

With the Massachusetts legislature and the governship in the hands of Democrats, wouldn’t voters in liberal Massachusetts be happy? Not hardly. Now add in Congress–completely in the hands of Democrats–and a Democratic President. During the past year, they have spent like there’s no tomorrow. Massachusetts residents may be liberal, but they’re not dumb. Sooner or later the bill for that spending must come due.

The last straw was the current health care “reform” measure. It doesn’t take a genius to see the money being wasted in this legislation. To get enough votes so that it would pass the Senate, giveaways (measured in billions of dollars) were done for Louisiana, Nebraska, and Connecticut; there are probably many, many more that no one knows about. After all, the legislation runs over 2,700 pages. I, and other bloggers, have noted, “It’s unpopular, unworkable, and insane, so naturally they’re in a hurry to pass it.”

Voters in Massachusetts and elsewhere want a small, nimble government. What they see coming out of Washington and the local state house is bloated bureaucracy. If you are a politician running for office this year a message has been sent. Imagine you’re going through a tunnel, and you see a light getting brighter and brighter. For those politicians who will embrace what voters want, the tunnel is at an end. I believe that for many politicians the light is an oncoming train.

It’s Unpopular, Unworkable, and Insane, So Naturally They’re in a Hurry to Pass It

Monday, December 21st, 2009

So I noted last month (more accurately, noting that Joe Kristan’s comment was completely accurate). We have a new listing of the taxes in the healthcare legislation. The new taxes are noted by italics while taxes that have been removed are noted by strikeout text.

1. Individual Mandate Tax. For those who don’t purchase health insurance, this income tax surcharge will start at $95 $495 (S)/$295 $990 (2)/$1485 (3+) or 0.5% of AGI in 2014 and rise in 2016 and future years to $750 $495/$2250 $990/$1485 or 2% of AGI.

2. Employer Mandate Tax. On businesses with 50+ employees that do not offer health care, and at least one employee qualifies for a tax credit, $750/employee. This will cause many small businesses to stop growing once they reach 49 employees.

There is also a waiting period tax of $400 (if the wait is 30-60 days) or $600 (60+ days). This tax also starts in 2014.

3. Excise Tax on Health Insurance Plans. Beginning in 2013, 40% tax on plans costing $8500/$23,000. Is indexed to CPI. In high premium states such as California, many plans would pay this tax. My health insurance would likely pay this tax…and it’s not a Cadillac plan. There’s a higher threshold for early retirees ($9850/$26,000) and those in “high-risk” professions. Longshoremen are exempt.

4. Health Insurance would be reported on W-2s. Another mandate that increases costs for business.

5. “Medicine Cabinet Tax.” Limitation on HSAs, FSAs, and MSAs to purchase non-prescription medication except insulin. Note that this is also in the House healthcare bill.

6. HSA Withdrawal Tax Increased. The tax would increase to 20% from 10%. This is also in the House legislation.

7. FSAs capped at a maximum of $2500. They are now uncapped.

8. 1099 Reporting for corporations. Requires businesses to send 1099-MISCs to corporations. This is another cost for businesses. This will begin in 2011 and will definitely increase my income.

9. Tax on Charitable Hospitals. This excise tax of $50,000 per hospital impacts hospitals that don’t meet new Department of Health and Human Services regulations.

10. Tax on Drug Companies. The tax would be $2.3 billion based on sales percentage.

11. Tax on Medical Device Manufacturers. The $2 billion tax is also based on sales percentage. It rises to $3 billion in 2017.

12. Tax on Health Insurers. A $6.7 $10 billion tax based on percentage of health insurance premiums collected. It now phases in gradually until 2017.

13. Elimination of tax deduction for employer provided retirement prescription drug coverage.

14. Increase of percentage of AGI required to deduct medical expenses from 7.5% to 10%. Few can deduct medical expenses today; fewer will be able to deduct them tomorrow.

15. Compensation Limitation for Health Insurance Executives. If you work in that industry, you will be limited to a salary of $500,000.

16. Medicare Payroll Tax Hikes. Once your income exceeds $200,000/$250,000 (MFJ), you will pay an additional 0.5% 0.9% tax. Note that the employer will only collect (and be responsible for this tax) if you earn $200,000/$250,000 or more. This also impacts the self-employed. And the law is written so that the self-employed cannot deduct half of the new tax as a deduction to income tax.

17. Blue Cross Tax. There is a tax deduction available today for Blue Cross and Blue Shield companies; this tax deduction will vanish if they don’t spend 85% (or more) of premiums on clinical services.

18. Excise Tax on Cosmetic Medical Procedures. A new 5% excise tax on these procedures.

18. Tax on Indoor Tanning. A new 10% excise tax on indoor tanning salons.


This is bad legislation, unwieldy, probably unconstitutional, and will hurt us all. So of course there’s a rush to pass it….

Health Care Legislation: We’ll be Paying for This

Sunday, December 20th, 2009

There is no free lunch. If the government provides us a benefit, it’s really we who provide that benefit. It’s our government, and the money that it’s giving us is our own, whether that money is borrowed or comes from tax receipts.

The health care legislation that appears likely to pass the Senate is such a bill. The legislation, which runs at least 2000 pages, contains numerous tax components. The latest change eliminates a tax on cosmetic surgery but adds a tax on indoor tanning. Medicare taxes will be increased on individuals earning more than $200,000 by 0.9%. Those are just two of the taxes in this legislation.

And there are numerous carve-outs and special deals so that the bill could make its way through the Senate. Nebraska won’t have to pay for Medicare; the other states will under this legislation. That deal was so that Ben Nelson, a Democrat who represents a relatively conservative state (Nebraska), would vote for the bill. There are provisions in the legislation that aid Louisiana and Indiana, states that are also relatively conservative and have Democratic Senators.

And what do we get for this? I’m still unsure; it appears to be some sort of mandatory health insurance program. What it will likely be is a lot more work for people like me, and a lot more bureaucracy. And a lot higher taxes. The bill, if it passes, will be passed on a straight party-line vote.

18 Tax Changes in Senate Healthcare Bill

Friday, November 20th, 2009

Senator Harry Reid’s (D-NV) healthcare legislation has 18 tax changes according to Americans for Tax Reform. Here’s a list of the taxes and their impacts (note: Dollar figures are single/single 2+ (S2) or MFJ):

1. Individual Mandate Tax. For those who don’t purchase health insurance, this will start at $95/$285 (S2) in 2014 and rise in 2016 and future years to $750/$2250.

2. Employer Mandate Tax. On businesses with 50+ employees that do not offer health care, and at least one employee qualifies for a tax credit, $750/employee. This will cause many small businesses to stop growing once they reach 49 employees.

3. Excise Tax on Health Insurance Plans. Beginning in 2013, 40% tax on plans costing $8500/$23,000. Is indexed to CPI. In high premium states such as California, many plans would pay this tax. My health insurance would likely pay this tax…and it’s not a Cadillac plan.

4. Health Insurance would be reported on W-2s. Another mandate that increases costs for business.

5. “Medicine Cabinet Tax.” Limitation on HSAs, FSAs, and MSAs to purchase non-prescription medication except insulin. Note that this is also in the House healthcare bill.

6. HSA Withdrawal Tax Increased. The tax would increase to 20% from 10%. This is also in the House legislation.

7. FSAs capped at a maximum of $2500. They are now uncapped.

8. 1099 Reporting for corporations. Requires businesses to send 1099-MISCs to corporations. This is another cost for businesses.

9. Tax on Charitable Hospitals. This excise tax of $50,000 per hospital impacts hospitals that don’t meet new Department of Health and Human Services regulations.

10. Tax on Drug Companies. The tax would be $2.3 billion based on sales percentage.

11. Tax on Medical Device Manufacturers. The $2 billion tax is also based on sales percentage.

12. Tax on Health Insurers. A $6.7 billion tax based on percentage of health insurance premiums collected.

13. Elimination of tax deduction for employer provided retirement prescription drug coverage.

14. Increase of percentage of AGI required to deduct medical expenses from 7.5% to 10%. Few can deduct medical expenses today; fewer will be able to deduct them tomorrow.

15. Compensation Limitation for Health Insurance Executives. If you work in that industry, you will be limited to a salary of $500,000.

16. Medicare Payroll Tax Hikes. Once your income exceeds $200,000/$250,000 (MFJ), you will pay an additonal 0.5% tax. Note that the employer will only collect (and be responsible for this tax) if you earn $200,000/$250,000 or more. This also impacts the self-employed. And the law is written so that the self-employed cannot deduct half of the new tax as a deduction to income tax.

17. Blue Cross Tax. There is a tax deduction available today for Blue Cross and Blue Shield companies; this tax deduction will vanish if they don’t spend 85% (or more) of premiums on clinical services.

18. Excise Tax on Cosmetic Medical Procedures. A new 5% excise tax on these procedures.


Remember, all tax increases are passed to consumers. There is no free lunch. If this legislation passes, you and I will be paying more for less.

Additionally, when government takes more, businesses either have to increase prices, cut wages, or do something else to still make a profit. If this legislation passes businesses will cut staffing. That’s basic economics, something sorely lacking in Washington.

Businesses will increase prices, but the law of supply and demand dictates that their revenues will likely decrease because of the higher prices.

I haven’t seen a tax professional speak in favor of this legislation. And I doubt I will; this measure will increase costs for businesses, lead to higher cots for consumers, and will almost certainly lead to a single-payer system. Peversely, this measure would likely lead to more business for me…for all the wrong reasons. As Joe Kristan says, “It’s unpopular, unworkable, and insane, so naturally they’re in a hurry to pass it.” Truer words have never been spoken.

Other coverage:
Roth Tax Updates
Don’t Mess With Taxes
Tax Lawyer’s Blog

Why Gamblers Should Dislike PelosiCare

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009

Suppose you’re an amateur gambler. Say you’re a college student. You net $45,000 playing poker tournaments. When you determine your annual wins and losses you find that your gross winnings are $800,000 and your gross losses are $755,000. You take the losses as an itemized deduction, and you pay tax based on the $45,000 of income (less your exemption and any other itemized deductions).

Under the House Health Care Plan (aka PelosiCare), the hypothetical gambler would be hit with a 5.4% surtax on his $800,000 of Adjusted Gross Income, or $43,200. Ouch.

So let’s see what the taxes would be (using 2008 rates, except for PelosiCare):

Federal Income Tax: $6,113
California Income Tax: $1,907
PelosiCare Surtax: $43,200

Total Taxes: $51,220

Yes, an individual would owe $51,220 of tax on $45,000 of income; he would actually lose $6,220 by earning $45,000! Ignoring the substantive issues with health care reform, the tax portion of the legislation is mind-boggling. It would also lead to more amateur gamblers not reporting their true income (e.g. more tax evasion) and would lead to lower tax collections in the United States.

Hopefully this proposal (which apparently is now 43 pages longer–up to 2,033 pages!) will die and something that’s a lot more reasonable will take its place.