Archive for the ‘New York’ Category

Indians 5, New York 4

Sunday, January 25th, 2009

New York suffered a setback this week in its fight against the Cayuga Indian Nation. The Cayugas have been selling cigarettes without New York sales and cigarette taxes; district attorneys had previously executed search warrants and seized records from their cigarette stores. A state appellate court issued a preliminary injunction stopping the district attorneys from pursing the matter until the appeal is heard.

The stores, operated by the Cayugas, have been closed since mid-December. It’s likely they’ll soon be reopened. The last time I reported on this the score was New York 4, Indians 3. It looks like a two-run homer for the Indians from this vantage point.

Not So Fast, New York

Sunday, December 28th, 2008

New York’s attempt to tax cigarettes sold on Indian reservations in the Empire State hit a roadblock last week. Judge Rose Sconiers issued a temporary restraining order against New York and barred collection of the sales tax. A hearing on a permanent injunction will be held in Buffalo on January 27th.

New York Governor Looks to Increase 88 Taxes and User Fees

Tuesday, December 16th, 2008

New York already already has the second worst tax climate in the country according to the Tax Foundation. Governor David Paterson today announced a budget that seeks to add or increase 88 taxes and user fees.

User fees are just another form of taxes, and as I’ve said before all taxes and fees are passed on to consumers. New York faces another difficulty in adding taxes: its proximity to other states. If clothes cost more in New York, consumers can always go to New Jersey or Connecticut.

There are some planks of Governor Paterson’s budget that deserve praise. Governor Paterson proposes eliminating seven state agencies. He also proposes the smallest increase in spending in years, just 1%.

Here are just some of the taxes/user fees that are proposed:
– An increase on the tax on beer, wine, and flavored malt beverages;
– An iPod tax on digital downloads;
– State sales tax on entertainment purchases, taxis, buses, limousines, and satellite and cable television;
– A $0.50 cigar tax;
– An 18% tax on non-diet sodas; and
– Luxury taxes on expensive cars, yachts, airplanes, furs, and jewelry.

Of course, this is just a budget, and it must be approved by the New York state legislature. Governor Paterson told the New York Daily News, “If you start taxing at times when [revenues are] receding, you’ll drive job creators out of the state.” He could teach California’s legislature and governor something about basic economics. We’ll see if the New York legislature understands that.

New York 4, Indians 3

Sunday, December 14th, 2008

In New York state there’s been a festering battle between state government and Indian tribes regarding cigarette sales. There were several developments last week.

Judge Kenneth Fisher of the state Supreme Court (equivalent to a district court in California) ruled that the Cayuga Indian nation cannot sell tax-free cigarettes at its stores in Union Springs and Seneca Falls, New York. Judge Fisher noted that the stores are not on Indian reservations. District attorneys in Cayuga and Seneca counties plan on presenting charges to grand juries. The Cayuga Indian tribe will appeal, and that battle could last years.

Meanwhile, a bill that would tax all Indian cigarette sales in New York is awaiting the signature of Governor David Paterson. Indian nations complain that this legislation, if signed, is an attack on their sovereignty. The Buffalo News is reporting that Paterson will sign the legislation though it will take some time to craft regulations to enforce the new law. Additionally, a legal challenge by the Indian tribes is almost certain.

Finally, the New York Times has an excellent article exploring New York City’s battle with a nearby Indian tribe that sells a lot of tobacco. New York City is suing the tribe. With most government budgets being under stress you can expect all local governments to go after anything that even looks remotely promising as a source of funds.

Bozo Preparers Running Rampant in New York

Monday, December 1st, 2008

There are good tax preparers and bad ones. There appear to be plenty of the latter in the Empire State.

The New York Department of Taxation and Finance sent some undercover inspectors to various tax professionals in New York. What they found, as reported in the Wall Street Journal, is enough to make me cringe.

One Queens, New York tax preparer allegedly told an undercover investigator, “I did not declare your full gross income from your business because you will pay a lot of taxes.” That preparer is facing a criminal complaint.

Another reported one-tenth of the taxable income: $13,188 versus $131,884. The Journal didn’t report what excuse was used for that case. And multiple preparers told investigators to shred certain documents so that they wouldn’t have to include it on their tax returns.

But it actually got worse:

In one case, a preparer told an undercover agent to step outside his office and return with a different set of records. When he returned, the preparer told him: “You know why I asked you to do that? Because if I have to swear it, I can say I swear to God that these are the papers you brought to me.”

William Comiskey, Deputy Commissioner of the New York Department of Taxation and Finance, noted that had the fraud gone undetected it would have cost $4 million in tax to federal, state, and local governments. Worse, “evidence of fraud” was found at 40% of the 85 preparers visited.

And this isn’t just a New York problem. A friend of one of my clients was told by his tax ‘professional’ that because options aren’t reported to the IRS you don’t have to claim income earned from options on your tax return. Of course, my client heard that and thought his income was going to be a lot less than he had thought. I had to give the bad news to my client—unless Congress specifically exempts income it’s taxable—and income from options is taxable.

Meanwhile, New York has sent 1,570 “Dear Valued Taxpayer” letters to individuals who used these less than professional tax preparers. Additionally, the state has opened 1,378 fraud investigations through October and had sent 329 cases to prosecutors.

Remember, there’s no free lunch. Use a reputable preparer, and know that if you earn a lot of income you’re going to owe some tax. If it sounds too good to be true it probably is.

Depression or Avoidance?

Wednesday, October 22nd, 2008

There’s a scandal in New York involving the Governor’s Chief of Staff. Charles O’Byrne is Chief of Staff to New York Governor David Paterson. He makes a good salary ($178,500 a year). He also owes $200,000 in back taxes—he didn’t file tax returns from 2001 through 2005 (from the news story it appears the unpaid taxes are New York state income taxes).

Mr. O’Byrne blames bouts of clinical depression for the failure to file tax returns. Republicans in the state senate are trying to make hay on this, and are starting an investigation. Governor Paterson (who succeeded to office after the Eliot Spitzer scandal) promises to soon disclose Mr. O’Byrne’s tax records.

In any case, if you are an elected government official, or if you are a high staff member of such an official, make sure you pay your taxes. You can be that if you don’t the opposition—be it Republicans or Democrats—will use this against you politically.

A New York Doctor/Gambler Hits Three Lemons

Saturday, June 7th, 2008

The TaxProf Blog alerted me to an interesting Tax Court case decided earlier this week. Once again the Court looked at whether or not an individual can be a professional gambler when that individual specializes in video poker.

In video poker, you play against a machine and attempt to try to get the best payout possible. Because the payouts are shown on the machine you can calculate your exact expected value by playing any machine.

The petitioners in todays case were a successful New York City physician and his wife. The doctor decided that he wanted to start playing video poker, and he went to the nearby Mohegan Sun casino. He looked at the paytables of various video poker machines and only played progressive machines with big payouts.

To be a professional gambler an individual needs to keep good records. I recommend to everyone they keep a gambling log: a pocket notebook where you record your wins and losses. But the petitioner in today’s case decided to rely on the casino for his records:

Petitioners were misguided to assume that Dr. Merkin’s Players Club card would keep a complete business record of his activities at a casino and that this record would absolve them of the duty to maintain business records. See sec. 6001. It is the taxpayer’s duty, and not that of the casino, to maintain such records. Sec. 6001. In short, his lack of records and accountability for his activities illustrates to us that Dr. Merkin did not carry on his video poker playing in a businesslike manner.

The Court didn’t like that his Club card was his only record: “In fact, the only credible evidence in the record with respect to Dr. Merkin’s time spent playing video poker in 2003 was a Player’s Club statement generated by Mohegan Sun and provided by petitioners at trial.”

That was strike one.

Next, it helps to be profitable. One of the tests to see if an individual is conducting a business or a hobby is whether he makes money. The petitioner was losing money, so did he change his system?

Despite Dr. Merkin’s playing time (whether it was 319 or 1,128 hours), he did not testify that he spent any time honing or adjusting his system when it became clear to him that he was not on track to make a profit playing video poker in 2003. See sec. 1.183-2(b)(2) and (3), Income Tax Regs. Dr. Merkin did testify that he read video poker magazines and kept abreast of the machines and their respective payout histories at the casino, but he did not prove that he used this knowledge to adjust his system in the light of his overall losses. We view Dr. Merkin’s failure to spend any time adjusting and/or improving his system as a factor weighing against his gambling activity’s being a trade or business.

He didn’t, and that was strike two.

Next, the petitioners argued that if you included the value of the gifts they received with their Club card they would be profitable. But there’s a problem with that, and the Court saw it quite easily:

The items he earned through redemption of his Player’s Club points were items that he essentially paid for with the amounts that he bet. Put another way, if petitioners were to have purchased all of the items they received through the redemption of their Player’s Club points in 2003, it is highly improbable that the value of those items would equal the amount of money wagered by Dr. Merkin in 2003.

Moreover, and with respect to the items for which Dr. Merkin redeemed his Player’s Club points in 2003, we note that petitioners failed to report as income the value of any car, airfare, or travel that they acquired from the casino in 2003…However, if Dr. Merkin received any items of that type in redemption of his Player’s Club points, we could not permit him to have it both ways; that is, by taking the value of those items into account to determine whether his gambling activity was engaged in with the actual intent of making a profit while not including the value of those items in income.

That’s three strikes, but the Court found a fourth strike. The test to be a professional gambler includes that you use the income for your livelihood. However, the petitioner in this case is a successful physician who “…had ample disposable income as a result of Dr. Merkin’s practice to cover the expenses associated with two residences as well as Dr. Merkin’s spending while at Mohegan Sun.”

It doesn’t help when the petitioner admits that his gambling wasn’t making money. “Dr. Merkin conceded this reality when he admitted at trial that his system did not work.” Indeed, the physician has given up video poker.

But losing this case won’t be the end of the story for the doctor. He will soon be hearing from the New York Tax Department. Why? Because once your income reaches a certain level—and given the petitioner’s successful medical practice, it’s a certainty he’s well beyond that level—New York only allows 50% of itemized deductions. Thus, while the petitioner owed $21,000 in additional tax to the IRS, he will face a substantial tax bill from New York on his gambling…and he was an overall loser. At least he gets to deduct 50% of the losses; had he resided in Connecticut he would get none of the losses.

Case: Merkin v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2008-146

Crack Tax Redux

Sunday, February 17th, 2008

New York is facing a budget shortfall this coming year. Governor Eliot Spitzer has an interesting idea about how to fill the gap: a crack tax. I’ve written about these taxes before. Many states have these taxes (21 at last count); however, they sometimes don’t survive the courts.

In any case, Governor Spitzer’s proposal is to tax marijuana $3.50/gram and cocaine $200.00/gram. The proposal is estimated to bring in $13 million if it is enacted into law.

That doesn’t seem certain. Jeffrion Aubry (D-Queens) vows to fight this “boneheaded” proposal. And given that it would only bring in $13 million, other revenue enhancers (or cuts in spending) will be needed to balance New York’s budget.

News Story: Washington Post

Spitzer Abandons Internet Tax

Thursday, November 15th, 2007

It hasn’t been a good year for Governor Eliot Spitzer (D-NY).

First, he’s been accused of using state troopers to spy on political opponents. Next, he proposes to give illegal aliens drivers licenses—a measure that’s overwhelmingly not supported by New York residents. Eventually he abandons the idea. Then he supports a stretching of the definition of “nexus” for state sales taxes to include affiliate programs. Yesterday, he dropped the idea—at least for the time being.

Republicans were going to paint Spitzer as the “Grinch who stole Christmas.” Spitzer won’t have to deal with that, for now.

However, New Yorkers should still watch what happens in Albany. The State Department of Taxation and Finance still believes they’re right in their expansive view of nexus. This plan will likely reappear sometime in 2008.

New York Tries to Tax the Internet

Wednesday, November 14th, 2007

Governor Eliot Spitzer (D-NY) is leading the way. But it’s a taxing way. The New York Department of Taxation and Finance says that any company that has an affiliate program that has any affiliates in New York must charge sales tax on sales shipped to New York.

Currently, companies must charge sales tax when a business has a “nexus” in the state. That’s usually caused by having a physical presence (an office) or employees in that state. Amazon.com doesn’t have an office or employees in New York. Thus, they haven’t charged New Yorkers sales tax.

However, New York now says that having an affiliate in the state is enough to give a company a nexus in New York. This is an interesting theory, but it could run into difficulties. Glenn Reynolds, the Instanpundit, thinks it wouldn’t stand up in court.

In any case, Governor Spitzer is looking at a $4 billion deficit for next year and has pledged not to increase taxes. The Department of Taxation and Finance calls this a policy clarification. I hope they have a big budget for legal fees as that’s likely where this is headed.