Posts Tagged ‘StripClubs’

It Was Only $12 Million and You Seized it Five Years Ago, So Now You’re Filing Charges?

Monday, October 18th, 2010

One of my first ever blog posts (back in 2005) was short and succinct: “Cops Moonlighting as Strip Club Bouncers Charged with Tax Fraud.” Back in April, 2005, Michael Wellek, the owner of an Elk Grove Village (Illinois) strip club called “Heavenly Bodies” and his policemen workers found themselves in trouble.

It all began when $12 million in cash was seized from a warehouse owned by Mr. Wellek in 2003. The government accused Mr. Wellek of owing $11 million in taxes, penalties and interest. The civil case drags on to this day.

However, after five years there is an update. This past week Mr. Wellek was indicted on tax charges for not filing tax returns from 1989 to 1999 while maintaining that $12 million in a warehouse. The two-count indictment alleges that Mr. Wellek obstructed the IRS and filed a false tax return in 2000. Mr. Wellek’s attorney told both the Chicago Sun-Times and the Chicago Tribune that he expects Mr. Wellek to plead guilty to both charges this week.

Sometimes the wheels of justice turn very, very slowly.

News Stories: Chicago Sun-Times, Chicago Tribune

Sugar, Sugar

Sunday, September 19th, 2010

When I think of sugar, I think of the sweetener you put into a cup of coffee. Or perhaps this song:

But this is a tax blog, so we’re going to deal with something different…something very different. The Sugar House Lounge describes itself as “Denver’s most unique premium lounge and night club.” I’ll say that’s true.

It appears that the Sugar House Lounge was once a brothel, “where customers paid $300 for sex.” The former owner of the business, Scottie Ewing, sold the business back in 2005. Mr. Ewing received $150,000 plus a share of future revenues. Mr. Ewing then instructed the new owner for some time on how to run the business. That all seems normal (except for the prostitution).

I’m guessing, though, that Mr. Ewing left out to the new owners instructions on the necessity of filing tax returns. I say that because he didn’t. He did instruct the new owners on it being a good idea to use a “front company” to own the business.

In any case, last week Mr. Ewing pleaded guilty to one count of tax evasion in what appears to be a plea deal. (Both news stories emphasize the prostitution over the tax evasion.) He’ll be sentenced in late December.

News Stories: Here and Here

Companions to ClubFed

Sunday, July 11th, 2010

After a hectic Sunday, there’s nothing like that old standby, the Escort Service, to lighten an evening. I reported on Companions earlier this year. The owners of this Salt Lake City club did quite well but somehow forgot to report all of their income on their tax return. When the unreported gross receipts total $1.2 million and the IRS finds out, ClubFed is in your future.

Jodi Hoskins was found guilty earlier this year. Last week she was sentenced. Besides restitution of over $736,000, she’ll spend two years at ClubFed. Her then husband, Roy Hoskins, was sentenced to five years at ClubFed earlier this year.

As usual, it’s a whole lot easier to just pay the tax in the first place…but that rarely occurs to Bozo tax offenders.

Of Strip Clubs, Doormen, Taxi Drivers, and Ca$h

Sunday, May 2nd, 2010

I’ve made plenty of posts on strip clubs and how some owners of these clubs manage to “forget” to report all of their cash income. Well, I’m heading to Las Vegas next week for the annual California Society of Enrolled Agents’ SuperSeminar. There’s a battle shaping up in Las Vegas: the IRS versus strip clubs, doormen, and taxi drivers.

There are many strip clubs in Las Vegas. Suppose you own one of these clubs; how could you draw more customers? While advertising, signage, and word-of-mouth will clearly help, there are obvious limits to this given the nature of your business. So strip clubs pay out “finders’ fees” to doormen and taxi drivers.

Of course, that cash being paid out is taxable (all income is taxable unless exempted by Congress). But how much of it actually gets reported? If you guessed “about zero,” you’d be correct. And the IRS isn’t happy about this.

Doug Elfman of the Las Vegas Review-Journal reported on this last week. The IRS discovered how much cash was being thrown around (at least $100 per person brought to a club) and read club owners the riot act: Start following the law and issue 1099s or find yourselves at ClubFed.

Mr. Elfman noted that there’s one industry in Nevada that scrupulously follows the law: brothels. The oldest profession in the world knows to be smart with the IRS. We’ll see if the clubs follow suit or end up in trouble with the IRS.

A Companion to Tax Trouble

Sunday, March 21st, 2010

After ranting on health care, it’s time for the lighter side of taxes. That means a visit to that old standby, the escort service, where tax trouble is apparently second nature.

Let’s head to Salt Lake City where companionship appeared to have problems. Jodi Hoskins and her then husband, Roy Hoskins, ran an escort service to help with those issues. Companions was its name, and it did quite well. However, you wouldn’t know it if you looked at the Hoskins’ tax return.

They reported income of just over $70,000 in 2002. Their math skills, though, weren’t as good as their ability to live quite well. It seems that they understated their income by just a bit. The actual gross receipts in 2002 were $1,204,354 higher than what they claimed on their return. A “missed it by that much” moment to be sure. That’s an understatement of $485,443 in tax.

Unfortunately for the Hoskinses, the IRS and the Department of Justice discovered the evasion. Roy Hoskins pleaded guilty earlier this year; he’ll be sentenced on April 15th (how appropriate). Last week, Jodi Hoskins was found guilty of one count of tax evasion. Besides the restitution that will undoubtedly be ordered Ms. Hoskins is likely looking at a visit to ClubFed.

So if you run an escort service, be mindful that the IRS is well aware that it’s a cash business. Just report the cash, pay your tax, and live a somewhat less lavish lifestyle.

Links from the Blogosphere

Saturday, December 12th, 2009

Over the past few days there’s been plenty of good stuff in the tax blogosphere. Here are some highlights:

Joe Kristan wrote about William Benson. Mr. Benson wrote The Law That Never Was alleging that the 16th Amendment wasn’t ratified. He didn’t fare better with his appeal in an attempt to keep his tax reduction business alive. It’s as dead as the 16th Amendment is alive.

Mr. Kristan also wrote about yet another Renaissance, the Tax People, Inc. employee who will soon be residing at ClubFed. This time it’s the Tax Director, a definite misnomer for a business that practiced tax fraud.

It’s almost certain that 2010 will be the year of the Roth IRA Conversion. That said, Robert Flach has an excellent post about a pitfall that may hit some individuals who have IRAs with basis.

Strip clubs are a favorite of mine…er, that’s a favorite subject of mine when it comes to taxes. The TaxProf Blog reported on how the estate of a New York businessman was excused from paying $4 million in back taxes because the Mob thoroughly infiltrated the business.

Staying in the same area, the TaxGirl reported on a wise Madam who sent her help 1099-MISCs each year and paid her taxes. Yes, illegal income is taxable.

The Tax Lawyer’s Blog had 12 IRS Non-Filer Enforcement Stories. A couple of the stories highlighted had previously made Taxable Talk.

A busy week in the tax blogosphere as we head into the Christmas season. So whether you’re naughty or nice, remember to pay Uncle Sam.

Taxing Strip Clubs: OK; Taxing Escort Services: No

Monday, November 23rd, 2009

Somehow, strip clubs and taxes seem to follow each other. Usually I report on strip club owners who somehow forget that cash income is just as taxable as any other income. Today, however, it’s time to head to Utah and look at the application of taxes on strip clubs and escort services.

Back in 2004 the Utah legislature voted to impose a 10% tax on strip clubs and escort services; the tax would fund sex offender treatment for some incarcerated sex offenders and fund the Utah Attorney General’s task force looking at crimes against children. The tax is imposed on businesses where there’s nudity for more than 30 days, and impact admissions, user fees, food and beverages, and Utah-produced merchandise that is sold in the businesses.

The tax was upheld on the strip clubs:

In this case, the tax is triggered by nudity, which the (U.S.) Supreme Court has specifically declared ‘is not an inherently expressive condition. We find nothing in the record before us — either (in) the tax’s legislative history or in the text of the tax itself — establishing that the tax was enacted with the predominant purpose of suppressing protected expression.

However, the tax was ruled unconstitutional as far as escort services. The statute doesn’t relate escort to nudity, and so it was ruled too broad:

The tax defines an ‘escort’ as anyone who accompanies another for compensated companionship…Therefore, according to the plain terms of the statute, individuals who are paid for providing care for the elderly as well as those who are paid as tour guides would fall within the definition of an ‘escort,’ and any person or business who employs them would be subject to the tax.

So good news for escort services, for now, but bad news for strip clubs. Unless the nudity vanishes—and that would, one assumes, defeat the purpose—Utah’s strip club tax is constitutional.

A Strip of Evasion

Tuesday, August 7th, 2007

I’m heading to Florida tomorrow, so posting will be light to non-existent until the weekend. Until then, here’s yet another story of someone who got into tax trouble from a strip club. And, yes, the name of the individual did grab my attention.

Matthew Fox (no relation) was a bouncer at an Atlantic City, New Jersey strip club beginning in 1998. Later he was the manager of the club. Last week a jury convicted him of five counts of tax evasion for not reporting the approximately $400,000 he earned from the club (and evading about $110,000 in taxes according to this story). Mr. Fox and his wife were acquitted on a count of criminal conspiracy.

The indictment alleged that Mr. Fox was paid in cash for his work, but didn’t report the cash as income on his tax returns. Whether you are paid in cash, checks, or casino chips is irrelevant—in general, all wage income is taxable.

So if you do end up working at a strip club, do yourself a favor and report your income. It’s a lot easier and cheaper to pay the taxes now then it is to find yourself in court on trial for tax evasion.

An X-Rated Tax

Tuesday, July 10th, 2007

Democrats in Sacramento lack nothing in chutzpah. Democratic Assemblyman Charles Calderon is proposing an 8% tax on sexually explicit nightclub acts, sexually explicit pay-per-view movies, X-rated acts in public locations, and sales of sex toys.

Forgetting the dubious constitutionality of the proposed legislation, it is unlikely to go anywhere in Sacramento. Assembly Republicans, according to the story in the Sacramento Bee, vow to kill any new tax increase. Given the 2/3 vote required for an increase, this measure will die.

It would be nice to see our legislators in Sacramento looking at killing various government programs, so that instead of increasing revenues to cover a budget shortfall, they would be decreasing expenses. But that idea is, I think, over the head of the Democrats in Sacramento.

Don’t Lose My Number

Tuesday, July 10th, 2007

“Billy, Billy don’t you lose my number
Cos you’re not anywhere
That I can find you
Oh now Billy, Billy don’t you lose my number
Cos you’re not anywhere that I can find you, oh no”

(Don’t Lose My Number, by Phil Collins)

There are a lot of people hoping that one person did lose their phone number. Remember Deborah Palfrey, the alleged D.C. madam who wanted to sell her phone list of clients? Well, her phone records have now been released to the public. You can go to this website and attempt to get the records. I say “attempt” because so many people have gone to the site that the website is currently down! A judge last week lifted the injunction against Ms. Palfrey posting her list.

Already, one Senator has found his name on the list. Senator David Vitter (R-LA) said in a statement, “This was a very serious sin in my past for which I am, of course, completely responsible.” His name won’t be the only one found on the list.

Meanwhile, Congress continues to look more like a “do-nothing” Congress as far as tax legislation and pressing issues such as AMT relief. Perhaps our representatives will look at fixing real problems rather than covering their past transgressions…though I doubt that’s going to happen.