Taxable Talk

Back in 2005, I speculated that the IRS would write a regulation requiring withholding from poker tournaments. The IRS will, on Tuesday, announce Revenue Procedure 2007-57, requiring withholding from any winner of a poker tournament who has received more than $5000 in winnings from the tournament.

First, this is a Revenue Procedure; this is the lowest form of IRS regulation. (The Tax Code is statutory law; it's the highest form of regulation. Next are IRS regulations. Those are promulgated under the Tax Code. Then come from Revenue Rulings and then, finally, Revenue Procedures.)

Entities do not have to follow a Revenue Procedure. But Revenue Procedures are written so that entities usually follow them. They include verbiage that reads (this is taken from Revenue Procedure 2007-57), "The IRS will not assert any liability for additional tax or additions to tax for violations of any withholding obligation with respect to amounts paid to winners of poker tournaments under section 3402, provided that the poker tournament sponsor meets all of the requirements for information reporting under section 3402(q) and the regulations thereunder." Of course, this implies the IRS may assert violations to entities that don't follow the Procedure. Effectively, all casinos will likely follow the Procedure.

So what does Revenue Procedure 2007-57 say? In Section 3.01, it classifies poker tournaments as a "wagering pool." It does so by referencing United States v. Berent, 523 F.2d 1360, 1361 (9th Cir. 1975). And IRS regulation §31.3402(q)-1(b)(2) requires withholding on wagers in a wagering pool if the proceeds from the wager exceed $5,000.

Interestingly, the Revenue Procedure states that withholding will be required: "A poker tournament sponsor is required to withhold and report on payments of more than $5,000 made to a winning payee in a taxable year...." Per the regulations, the required withholding rate is 25%.

This has two impacts. First, anyone who wins more than $5,000 will receive 75% of his winnings (unless subject to a higher withholding rate). Second, many casinos will again start issuing W-2Gs to everyone who wins in a poker tournament. Once casinos have to start issuing W-2Gs to a few people, casinos will come to the conclusion it's easier to issue them to everyone.

As to the Revenue Procedure itself, I think it's a poor application of the law. As I reported back in 2005, I don't believe poker tournaments are a wagering pool. Wagering pools are when you wager on something else, such as a horse race. Indeed, the IRS came to that same conclusion as I did in a private letter ruling in 2005. The reality is, though, that I don't think a casino or cardroom is going to challenge the IRS on this. Their attorneys and tax counsels will say that the easiest thing to do is to go along with the IRS Revenue Procedure. Entities that don't will potentially be subject to additional IRS scrutiny, so following the Procedure is the course of least resistance.

What will the impact be to tournament poker? First, there will be additional compliance with the Tax Code. Given that more W-2Gs will be issued, and withholding will occur, the IRS will see additional collections (which is their goal). The other major impact of this ruling is that money will be taken out of the poker economy. Once this Revenue Procedure goes into effect (March 4, 2008), about 25% of the prize pool of major poker tournaments will vanish. Of course, the IRS will correctly note that this money should have been paid in taxes at some point. However, given that gambling losses are deductible against wins, some of the withheld funds would never have been owed in taxes because of gambling losses.

Will this impact the number of players in major poker tournaments? Possibly. Where it may have the biggest effect is in a series of major tournaments. Suppose John Doe wins $10,000 on day 1 of a tournament. Under the new Revenue Procedure, he will only keep $7,500. There's a higher chance of him not entering additional events so that the funds don't reenter the poker economy.

Link to Revenue Procedure 2007-57

A friend of mine received an email that states, in part:

"I do not agree with your synopsis though that gamblers of the 50 staets have any obligation whatsoever for the withholding of Federal income tax on lottery winnings. Why? Because subtitle A and subtitle C only relates to Government entities, foreigners and foreign corporations."

I'm leaving out the name of the individual (protecting the guilty) who sent this missive.

Every so often, I get an email like this, from someone who says there's no such thing as an income tax, it was never passed, etc. When this happens, I refer them to the Tax Protester FAQ. There, we read:

The claim that “United States citizens and residents are not subject to tax on their wages or other income derived from sources within the United States, as only foreign based income or income received by nonresident aliens and foreign corporations from sources within the United States is taxable, and similar arguments described as frivolous in Rev. Rul. 2004-30, 2004-1 C.B. 622” has been identified by the IRS as a “frivolous position” that can result in a penalty of $5,000 when asserted in a tax return or included in certain collection-related submissions. Notice 2007-30, 2007-14 I.R.B. 883.

The gentleman appears to make two claims: there is no right to withhold on lottery prizes, and US citizens don't have to pay income tax on gambling.

Withholding rules are regulations, enacted after Congress specifies that withholding will occur in certain situations. One of these areas is certain gambling prizes. Lottery winnings are subject to 25% federal tax withholding if the amount won is $5,000 (or more).

Additionally, all income earned in the United States is subject to the income tax, unless Congress specifically exempted it. Gambling income has not been exempted. If you don't pay the tax, you are violating the law. And if you ignore a W-2G that's issued (and if you've won a substantial prize in a lottery, a W-2G will be issued), the IRS will catch up with you. And if you make that argument in Tax Court, you will find yourself potentially paying a financial penalty (e.g. a $5,000 fine) for making a frivolous argument.

Today in San Diego a federal judge will hear arguments in a case between the Rincon Indian tribe and the State of California. The battle is over whether or not California negotiated in good faith over a compact with the Indian tribe for more slot machines for the Rincon Indian's casino (north of San Diego).

An expert from the state estimated that the 500 additional slot machines proposed for the tribe's casino would bring in just under $40 million a year. The tribe argues that California wanted about $38 million of that as the fee for the allowing the additional slot machines. The tribe argues that the state did not negotiate in good faith, and that the $38 million would be a "tax" rather than a fee.

On the other hand, California argues that they have negotiated in good faith; that they have reached agreements with numerous other tribes, including the neighboring Paula tribe; and that the additional machines would bring in money for the Rincon tribe.

A decision will likely be announced in a few weeks.

News Story: Here.

Today, the IRS issued its 2007-2008 Priority Guidance Plan. These are the major issues the IRS expects to complete during the year. There are 303 items on the list.

Poker tournaments remain on the IRS' radar screen. Like the previous two Priority Guidance Plans, one of the 303 projects is issuing a revenue procedure regarding the withholding rules for poker tournaments.

Other items on the list that appear interesting include:
- Guidance on the treatment of wrap fees;
- Guidance under section 263A regarding the treatment of post-production costs, such as sales-based royalties;
- Revenue procedure under section 6213 regarding internet and oral change of address requests;
- Guidance under section 6676 regarding the penalty for erroneous claims for refund; and
- Guidance under section 6694, as amended, regarding the penalty for understatements of taxpayer’s liability by tax return preparers.

There's plenty more, especially in technical guidance issues. I'll point out (as I did last year) that many of these 303 items will not be addressed by the IRS during the coming twelve months.